On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:28:41 -0700 SK <s...@metrokings.com> wrote: > Why labor over buggy Makefiles when you could be laboring over buggy > CMake files at a much more productive level of abstraction? :o)
I played with Waf a bit and it has nice support for D. However, despite many contributors listed, it still seems to be mostly one-man-show which makes me a bit reluctant to use it over Cmake (SCons seems to be very slow without much progress), so I wonder what is the current status of the project? Any hope that D support will be applied in upstream? What about 64bit support in dmd2? Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: CDBF17CA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
