On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:40:11 +0100 Jens Mueller <jens.k.muel...@gmx.de> wrote:
> I don't know about upstreaming it. Certainly it would be nice. But for > doing so I need polish it further. OK. > It seems that not many people are using CMakeD and there seems to be > less interest in it. I believe many are waiting that D(2) become consolidated a bit, 64bit port etc. At least, I'm the one of them. :-) > But I assume this is going to change once 64-bit is stable. > If I find some time I will build the above word cloud example for > 64-bit and report here, if that helps you. I'll take a look tomorrow closer look at CMakeD. > Recently I've been a bit distracted from CMakeD development since I > stumbled over > Gyp > http://code.google.com/p/gyp/ > and > Premake > http://industriousone.com/premake > Both address similar needs like CMake but do not support D yet. They look interesting, but I'm sure they cannot replace CMake and therefore hope D will become 1st class citizen in the CMake country. Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: CDBF17CA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature