On 02/22/2011 03:13 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I wonder if there is a way we could generalize "give me the implementation-specific representation of the first item *reference*"
If this means a generalisation of what D's builtin 'in' provides, then I think this would be great. Then, passing back the 'reference' would provide _direct_ access (without [new] lookup) either to read, remove, change... Can't we unify this with your notion of cursor? What do you think?
Denis -- _________________ vita es estrany spir.wikidot.com
