OK. I have the MDS product (QEDesign 1000) and could compare the coefficients
generated if that helps.
73,
John
KD6OZH
----- Original Message -----
From: Simon Brown
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 18:21 UTC
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] FIR Filters
Points taken John, but if I do all the coding then I will not find any errors
I think.
I'll know soon whether my design is correct - it's really a question of using
correct Nyquist adjusted frequencies etc.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
----- Original Message -----
From: John B. Stephensen
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] FIR Filters
A third party DFT implementation should prove that the coefficients aren't
completely incorrect. Beyond that, wouldn't it be more useful to feed the
filter design parameters into another implementation of the Remez exchange
algorithm and compare the results?
73,
John
KD6OZH
----- Original Message -----
From: Simon Brown
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 17:58 UTC
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] FIR Filters
Hi,
This is not a problem, but I would like to feed my data into a 3-rd party
program to prove my design, that's all :-)
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
----- Original Message -----
From: John B. Stephensen
Since the filter coefficients are the impulse response, you should be
able to do a DFT of the coefficients to get the frequency response.
