As there is not only Region II here is the link for the existing official Region I bandplan:
http://www.darc.de/bandplan/pdf/kwbandplan_col_eng_1.pdf Please note that this bandplan is mandatory for some countries (e.g. Germany) and not just an option somebody may follow or not. 73 Juergen, DL8LE --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bonnie suggested two URLs: > > 1. http://bandplans.com/ > > 2. http://hflink.com/bandplans/ > > The first starts out by saying > > "this site is not intended as any kind of recommendations for the > band usage. It merely records the users of the amateur HF bands & 6 > meters. Some band usage is controversial. Our job is not to make > judgement either ways... if there are multiple users for certain > frequencies, we will happily record both of them. Our rule of thumb > is: if you can hear QSOs on those frequencies, we will happily accept > an entry." > > While this site contains information that is useful in the band > planning process, its not a bandplan. > > Bonnie's second URL provides links to many band plans. One of those > links is to the IARU region 2 bandplan: > > http://www.hflink.com/bandplans/Region_2_MF__HF_Bandplan_Annex__1_2008 > .pdf > > This is dated 2008-01-01, as states "It is suggested that Member > Societies, in coordination with the authorities, incorporate it in > their regulations and promote it widely with their radio amateur > communities." > > However, this URL's link to the "ARRL new proposal..." is to a > bandplan proposal that the ARRL has withdrawn: > > http://hflink.com/bandplans/ARRLBandwidthBasedProposalCharts.pdf > > > The current ARRL bandplan is available via > > http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/bandplan.html > > 73, > > Dave, AA6YQ > > > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "kc4cop996" <dickzs@> wrote: > > > > Alan: > > > > I've been attempting to establish a list of a suggested frequencies > > to be used with the various digital modes in Region-Two for quite > > some time. I found bits and pieces of several of the HF bands have > > been set aside for RTTY and PSK 31. It appears that everyone > accepts > > to 14.0700 MHz as the frequency for PSK 31.. further action in > > developing digital band plans seems to stop at this point. I have > > seen several lists that appear to be well thought out. The problem > > seems to be that after the lists are compiled nothing is done with > > them. > > > > A post to you from Bonnie, VR2/KQ6XA, contains what I think is a > > very comprehensive plan. I would love to say "I vote f will move > or > > this", "amen", "put it into action". I do not feel that assignment > > of the digital sub bands needs approval of any type of committee or > > radio official. If this afternoon we say, Bonnie's suggested plan > is > > approved, and each of us immediately put the plan into action > through > > our operations on the bands, by spreading the concept by word-of- > > mouth, and publication of the band plan on amateur radio oriented > > websites and we would have a working digital band plan by the end > of > > August. > > Can I get any amen's for this? If so-let her rip.Alan: > > Dick Zseltvay, KC4COP > > > > > > > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Alan NV8A <nv8a@> wrote: > > > > > > Is there a list of generally accepted HF frequencies for digital > > modes > > > in Region 2 somewhere? > > > > > > 73 > > > > > > Alan NV8A > > > > > >
