Agreed, the more letters to the FCC the more problems for amateur radio.
From: "John B. Stephensen" <kd6...@comcast.net> Reply-To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:16:22 -0000 To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS . FCC request and response If someone sent a letter to the FCC about Chip64 they would get the same response that the FCC gave for ROS. The FCC only gets involved when someone complains. I think that they would love to have simpler and less restrictive rules to enforce. It's the public that opposes the removal of restrictions that they beleive favor their group. 73, John KD6OZH > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: jose alberto nieto ros <mailto:nietoro...@yahoo.es> > > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 01:02 UTC > > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS . FCC request and response > > > > > > > > That is a Spread Spectrum in all his expression and ¿Chip64 is legal?. Then > what are we discuss? > > > > > > De: silversmj <silver...@yahoo.com> > Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Enviado: mié,24 febrero, 2010 01:46 > Asunto: [digitalradio] Re: ROS . FCC request and response > > > > > Greetings All, > > Hmmm . . . with that stated, I guess all US stations should cease Chip64 > emissions as it is described using SS, see > http://www.arrl. org/FandES/ field/regulation s/techchar/ Chip64.pdf > <http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/techchar/Chip64.pdf> > (Note: ARRL) > > Someone should mention this to the ARRL VA Section NTS as they apparently run > a Net using Chip64, see > http://aresracesofv a.org/index. php?option= com_content& view=article& > id=88&Itemid= 95 > <http://aresracesofva.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=88&Item > id=95> > (Also note: ARRL) > > I have played with the earlier versions in RX and found it fun and > interesting, but 2250Hz wide BW in the CW portions of the Bands is a little > much. RTTY Tests are rough enough. > > As was mentioned before by an individual, it is easy for the for bureaucrats/ > authorities to just say "no", especially if they already have a busy day and > don't want to say they need more information. > > 73 & GL de Mike KB6WFC > > > >
