On 02/23/2010 10:50 PM, John B. Stephensen wrote: > The problem is that he said that ROS uses FHSS in the documentation. If > the final version doesn't use FHSS, DSSS or any other form of SS and a > technical specification is published the FCC will have no objection.
Oh, agreed. For the moment I will not be using ROS because (1) I am not sure whether or not it is SS, (2) I cannot run ROS on my computer (don't have Windows) and (3) the protocol specification is not available. I expect that once the protocol specification is available, and it is clear that ROS is not spread spectrum, I will start using it once there is a free implementation in eg. fldigi. -- All rights reversed.
