Hello Dave, K3DCW, and all others,
What an eyeopener, that QRZ forum!
http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=239742.
Have been there in the beginning of this venture, but after having been shouted
down on the other Yahoo group by some individuals and their uninformed
follower's, I was under the impression that as far as
the US ham population went this had become a "dead" issue, little interest, and
the "lets move on" motto in place.
Far from that, it appears.
I like to use this method and in spite of its author, figurehow more or less
useful it is in Weak Signal.
Like to refer to a serious article in the VHF/UHF/EME/microwave
magazine DUBUS. Reporting on some serious testing and comparisons with the EME
designed WSJT method(s) by K1JT.
Tests were done and reported by VK7MO, a well known weak signal person.
In my opinion this is drifting into an area that is not good for amateur radio.
The author refuses to listen, understand, address amateur radio licensing,
domestic and international oversight and regulation, frequency coordination,
and I can go on and on.
Keeps referring to me as the "ARRL's messenger" as I tried so many
times, to explain the difference between a radio amateur organization
and an US Federal Regulatory Agency with world wide connection to
the same in other countries.
It is for instance, a big puzzle how an author of a software
protocol can assign frequencies without checking with other users.
Anyway, glad to see that I not just a single trouble maker as I
am probably classified in certain circles.
73 Rein W6SZ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave" <hfradio...@...> wrote:
>
> Rein,
>
> There are several (around a dozen I think) amateur operators that are
> "prohibited" from using ROS by having their call signs hard-coded into a
> persona-non-grata listing in ROS. I am proud to be one of those ops. This
> has been extensively documented on QRZ in the following thread:
> <http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=239742>
> http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=239742.
>
> I didn't think that John was one of them, but it has been awhile since the
> list was looked at last.
>
> Dave
> K3DCW
>
>
> _____
>
> From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Rein A
> Sent: Wednesday, 02 June, 2010 17:12
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
>
>
>
>
> Hello John,
>
> If your situation is not due to an installation problem
> or other, but is part of the distributed software, planned,
> programmed in, it might well have other consequences.
>
> ROS modem is under consideration to be incorporated in other
> amateur radio digital packages.
> Think about that angle.
>
> 73 Rein W6SZ
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com <mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>
> , "John Becker, WØJAB" <w0jab@> wrote:
> >
> > Rein
> >
> > Really don't know what to say at this point.
> > Still trying to understand why my call was added to
> > the list of calls "not able" to use the ROS program.
> >
> > But since Jose will not say I'll just move on to things
> > other then ROS. But I'm not the only one that this
> > has happen to. No big deal I have gotten over it long ago.
> >
> > Now I'm just guessing but I think he may have misunderstood
> > something I may have said in a post. Really not sure for the reason
> > but since he is not talking about it I guess anyone of us that have
> > been banned from using the program will never know.
> >
> > It all started when he posted a update to his program and then I
> > found out that I could no longer us it. Like others.
> >
> > But I still have one of the first versions on a memory stick
> > that I could use on the other computer if needed.
> >
> > Seems he is the *only* one that's knows and at this time is
> > not saying. So be it - I got over it long ago.
> >
> > John, W0JAB
> >
>
