My first exposure to RTTY was an old genuine teletype machine with a crummy 
interface. It was heavy, made a lot of noise, smelled great and I should never 
have gotten rid of it. 

As for CW, I learned it well enough to pass the exam. I used it only for MS. I 
suppose I could relearn it.

ve3bdr in kanuckistan


From: J. Moen 
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 6:51 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS v4.7.4 Beta


  

I know this is out of fashion, but I really like PSK31, for its narrow 
bandwidth and effectiveness with low power.  It was the first mode I ever did 
where I could have a QSO with a signal burried by the noise.  I like some of 
the newer modes, and am happy to see the popularity of Olivia and Contestia.  
Of course, intellectually, I probably prefer CW to all of these, since its the 
first digital mode, but I just never developed the skill I wanted in that mode. 
 RTTY was something as a new ham in the early 1960s that I badly wanted to do, 
but teletypes were hard to get and life intervened, and I didn't actually do 
any RTTY until recently.  It was like driving a wonderful old car from the 
1930s -- slow, inefficient, unwieldy, but neat just because it's old.

  Jim - K6JM

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: la7um 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 9:10 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ROS v4.7.4 Beta

  Wow Steinar. This really tells the true story about your (and mine) love for 
RTTY (stoneage/museum,power wasting,polluting KW) KAANTEST MODE. TTY was 
created for cables, not radio, I believe. Hi.
  la7um Finn 

  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland <saa...@...> wrote:
  >
  > 
  > Despite the massive criticism, this fascinating ROS guy has now released
  > a new version of his software.
  > 
  > http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
  > 
  > Sorry Buddy, but I have to admit, I find ROS more interesting than
  > anachronistic contest mode like RTTY.
  > 
  > la5vna Steinar




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.839 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3012 - Release Date: 07/17/10 
14:35:00

Reply via email to