Juergen,

I was listening/looking at that time and saw one signal but it was too weak 
to decode. I assume it was you.

Bob, WU9Q

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Juergen" <dl...@darc.de>
To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 5:58 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: CMSK Freq's


> Looking at the JT65-signals on 14076 yesterday and comparing them with 
> other days the propagation was indeed very poor (at least on my side). The 
> RB reports on W4CQZ's webpage showed similar results.
>
> I will try to be qrv again today and tomorrow around 2200 UTC on 14076 + 
> 1000 Hz, USB in CMSK31 and CMSK63.
>
> 73
>
> Juergen, DL8LE
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave 'Doc' Corio" <dco...@...> 
> wrote:
>>
>>     I alternated calls to you and calls to CQ and never heard another
>> signal. Not sure how propagation is, though.
>>
>> 73
>> Dave
>> KB3MOW
>>
>>   -----Original Message-----
>>   From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
>> [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
>> Behalf Of Juergen
>>   Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:30 PM
>>   To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>>   Subject: [digitalradio] Re: CMSK Freq's
>>
>>
>>
>>   Called there in CMSK31 and 63 from 22.00 - 22.30 UTC. No reply. Will be
>> there again tomorrow.
>>
>>   73
>>
>>   Juergen, DL8LE
>>
>>   --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "k8yzk" <k8yzk@> wrote:
>>   >
>>   > I know CMSK is mainly for 160/80 metes (which I currently can't do), 
>> but
>> what freq's are being used currently on the other bands/
>>   >
>>   > thanks and 73
>>   > Kurt
>>   >
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
> Chat, Skeds, and "Spots" all in one (resize to suit)
>
> Facebook= http://www.facebook.com/pages/digitalradio/123270301037522
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 


Reply via email to