Le 2010-11-02 11:40, Miguel Angel Frías Bonfil a écrit :
According to me, Libre Office is developed primary on C++ with GTK, just the
extensions are on Java.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:36 AM, T. J. Brumfield<enderand...@gmail.com>wrote:
I'm an user, and not a developer. So perhaps this is a silly question.
> From a user's perspective, it always seemed like the Java portions of OOo
were shoehorned in. Starting a JVM eats up unneccessary memory and takes
time. One of the most common complaints of OOo is that it is a bloated app
that is slow and takes up too many resources.
I assumed that Sun kept the Java portions of OOo in since they liked to
push
Java. In the age of netbooks, tablets and mobile computing, trimming the
fat
becomes more important.
Would it be possible to remove the Java portions of LibreOffice and
reimplement them without the need to fire up a JVM?
Is there a technical advantage of running the wizards and such in Java that
I'm not aware of?
Thanks!
-- T. J. Brumfield
"I'm questioning my education
Rewind and what does it show?
Could be, the truth it becomes you
I'm a seed, wondering why it grows"
-- Pearl Jam, Education
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to
discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org<discuss%2bh...@documentfoundation.org>
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Not only that, considering that Oracle is now in litigation over the use
of Java, many are taking a closer look at the Java implementations and
wondering they should keep Java at all in their code, this even if they
are not in the wrong,
Marc
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
