Thorsten Behrens wrote
> terribly sorry if we ever gave that impression. Admittedly, the
> entry on http://www.documentfoundation.org/contribution/ was worded
> like that ("Public discussions of the Board of Directors"), but I'm
> rather certain it should read "List for focused interaction of the
> public with the Board of Directors" instead. Page changed
> accordingly, board-discuss in Cc: in case there's disagreement. ;)

I'm not sure that is the idea. Otherwise you would not get the following
message when you try to post to that list on Nabble

" Authorized Users Only
Only authorized users can proceed in this area. You can use the form below
to send a request to the administrators.
Access Request

Explain to the administrator(s) why you want to access this restricted area.
"

I particularly like the part "Explain why"

So I guess it was not meant for "interaction of the public". Maybe
"interaction of the members" at best...

Regards,
Pedro



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-Rules-of-Procedure-approved-for-TDF-board-of-directors-tp4010079p4010349.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to