"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The corrections happened after it was posted to many lists. > > No, they didn't. The savannah hackers knew about this before it > happened, and where working on a fix before it. [...]
Yes, the corrections *happened* after it was posted. I have no info about whether the savannah hackers were working on a fix before that: can you prove your claim? [...] > Also, it's only a postponement, not a long-term fix. Please help > explain to [EMAIL PROTECTED] why requiring a known-buggy > GPL-incompatible licence is a bad idea. > > Please spreading these untruths. Nobody is requiring you to license > material under the GFDL, you can license it under the BSD and the GFDL > if you so wish. So you're not required to license under FDL, but can license under BSD and FDL if you wish: to me, that looks like requiring FDL to be permitted and so it's not "untruths". You cannot use the GPL, for example. > Nor is the GFDL buggy in any sense that you claim that it is. [...] Why is a new version planned, then, if it has no bugs? -- MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ irc.oftc.net/slef Jabber/SIP ask _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@fsfeurope.org https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion