At 10:39 PM 2/28/2010 +0000, Michael Foord wrote:
On 28 February 2010 22:14, P.J. Eby
<<mailto:p...@telecommunity.com>p...@telecommunity.com> wrote:
At 10:03 PM 2/28/2010 +0100, Jean Daniel wrote:
Can this be simpler?
Yes. Don't install docs with your package. People who want them
installed locally can just download your source install or use easy_install -e.
Also, if your module is popular enough that people make Linux system
packages for it, they will make sure the docs get put in a blessed
install location. Python doesn't currently have a blessed install
location for documentation, though perhaps it *should* have one in distutils2.
How to include documentation in a package is a common question, so
it would be great if distutils2 could deal with this issue.
My current solution is, as Phillip suggests, to not include the docs
in distributions available via PyPI and to provide a more 'complete'
download separately.
That's not what I suggested, actually. I said, don't *install* docs
with your package. Do *include* them in your source distribution,
though, so people can download and read them with easy_install -e,
and also so that those system packagers only have to download one
tarball. You also need only produce a standard source distribution
(setup.py sdist upload) for PyPI.
In other words, Jean Daniel should retain his source layout of:
wordish-1.0.2/
setup.py
wordish.py
docs/
index.html
command-ref.html
And simply make sure that docs/ is under revision control
(setuptools) or add a "recursive-include docs" to MANIFEST.in
(distutils). Then, "setup.py sdist" will build a correct tarball.
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
