On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:35:44 -0700 "arthur debert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oh My! > > my bad. yes that should read.. > " are not going to achieve *great* performance on DREAMHOST." > > I just meant to say that dreamhost has nice price / feature ration but > it's just a little unreliable to host a *critical* site on it. > > Isn't it great that you could just read through my mistake (and have > no doubs that I was talink about dreamhost...)? > > cheers One way that I've found to keep the "startup performance" thing in check is to write a checker bot on my home server that hits a simple page every 5 minutes. That keeps it alive pretty much, so the only time I get the dreaded 1-10 second startup penalty is when I kill everything and start it up from scratch. Once you figure out the ins and outs of FastCGI on Dreamhost, it's really not so bad. - jmj --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
