Well, it appears that r10088 fixed things up, actually. http://code.djangoproject.com/changeset/10088
Thanks for your interest in helping anyway, Ramiro! On Mar 18, 12:10 pm, Ramiro Morales <cra...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:06 PM, bobbyc <bobbyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > r10071 was the last successful one. > > Ok. Several questions, hopefully you have the time > needed to answer them: > > What value does your DEBUG setting have? > > Can you checkout different revisions of Django > and test to confirm if 10074 is the revision where your > problems started? > > Can you reduce your problematic models to a minimal test case? > and paste it to dpaste.com? > > Do the problematic models have circular references among them?. > > Regards, > > -- > Ramiro Moraleshttp://rmorales.net --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
