On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 09:58:19AM +0100, Luigi Baldoni wrote:
> On 4 January 2024, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 08:08:46PM +0100, Luigi Baldoni wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to get rid of a second (kea) dhcp server and
> > > hopefully be able to do everything I need with dnsmasq.
> > >
> > > The main hurdle, so far, is to run the nameserver only
> > > on eth1, because bind is listening on eth0, but have
> > > the dhcp server listen on both interfaces (and more).
> >
> > What has already been tried?
> 
> Done several tests and if I launch dnsmasq first then neither it nor bind 
> will  complain,
> but ss lists both listening on port 53 on the same interface.

Mmm, I hoped that 'What has already been  tried?' got an answer like
  Configured for daemon A ...., for daemon B ....
  Configured for daemon A ...., for daemon B ....
  Configured for daemon A ...., for daemon B ....
  Configured for daemon A ...., for daemon B ....
  Repeated that with starting the other one first
  All iterations checked with ...
 
> > Advice: Tell in the reply more about the network, such as
> > which IP-addresses are on the network interfaces.
> 
> This is a map of my network:

[1]
 

> lan15 192.168.7.0/24 bind on 192.168.7.100 and dnsmasq dhcp on the same 
> address (can be changed)
> lan30 192.168.8.0/24 dnsmasq dhcp on 192.168.8.150
> lan45 192.168.11.0.24/ dnsmasq dhcp on 192.168.11.150
> lan130 192.168.130.0/24 dnsmasq ns and dnsmasq dhcp on 192.168.130.200
> lan166 192.168.166.0/24 dnsmasq dhcp on 192.168.166.200
 
Acknowledge on "these 5 networks". What about telling the IP-adresses on
the interfaces of the box where the tests^Wconfiguration attempts are done?

(I'm lost, previously one computer with eth0 and eth1, now five networks
and nothing about eth0 nor eth1.)


For what it is worth: Over here is it "dnsmasq works" My reason for
involvement in discussion like this is "can dnsmasq be better?" and/or
"what can i learn more about dnsmasq?".  I aim for win-win. Making lots
of effort to understand what is going on the other side, reduces "my win".


Groeten
Geert Stappers

[1] That "map" is not a map to me.  a map is a special kind of picture,
    it shows what is connected by what. (Villages by roads, Cities by
    railwaytracks, computers by network equipement.)
-- 
Silence is hard to parse

_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Reply via email to