On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 21:58 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: > > I suppose that I have good news and bad news... > > I do take exception to a few items that were done while converting this > from OOo to LO (as it were); and perhaps a few dumb things that I may > have done... > [snip] > > The screen shots showing OpenOffice.org macros rather than Libreoffice > macros in screen shots of the macro organizer are probably fine, but, > they are wrong. Lots of work to fix those... One example is Figure 6. > > A glaring omission in the document is that it does not mention that LO > requires that recording macros must be enabled (Tools > Options > > LibreOffice > General and then check "Enable experimental (unstable) > features). That is not required in OOo. > > Any idea when the extensions library for LO will be online? It is > referenced, but it takes you to a WIKI.
Thanks for reporting these problems, Andrew. Evidently the person who final-checked that file before publishing it (probably me) did an unusually poor job. I will fix most of it, but I may have to ask you questions about the screenshots. I don't know about the timing of the LO extension library. I know it's been under development for some time, but I don't know the latest info about it. --Jean -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
