Two thoughts about the copyright page for the LO Base Guide: 1) The OOo version of the existing chapters has not been published, and I understand that Dan Lewis is writing the LO version and OOo version in parallel. Therefore IMO the copyright page does not need the Acknowledgements section stating "This chapter is based upon..." with the list of contributors to the OOo chapter; all of those contributors should instead be listed in the Contributors section of both books and the Acks section removed.
2) As this book is unpublished, IMO it is a "new" document and could be licensed under Apache and CC-BY-SA as I suggested in a previous note... as long as all contributors agree. I believe we can contact all of those contributors to get their agreement, if they don't spot this note and speak up on this list. What do others think? Dan, am I correct in item 1 about you writing the two books in parallel? --Jean -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
