Hello, Is this ever likely to be fixed in dovecot?
It was mentioned in a previous thread before: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-December/035753.html Basically the vacation system is useless, most mail servers with anti-spam are rejecting the vacation replies because the sender isn't a valid address. This is the address that the auto replies are coming from: <<>@domain1.com> Stephen On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> wrote: > Are you sure it's because of a missing return path? Sounds more like the > message MIME body is broken. I've never checked if it is.. > > On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 03:19 +1100, Stephen Vaughan wrote: > > The vacation auto reply is being rejected by spamassassin, for > > bad_MIME > > > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> wrote: > > Pretty much the same thing, just replace "rejection" with > > "vacation" in > > my reply. Why do you want them to have the return path? > > > > > > On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 03:15 +1100, Stephen Vaughan wrote: > > > I was talking about vacation auto-reply messages missing the > > return > > > path > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 14:09 +1100, Stephen Vaughan > > wrote: > > > > I can see this has been discussed previously, was > > just > > > wondering if it's > > > > been fixed in v1.1.x? > > > > > > > > > I don't consider it a bug. Rejection messages > > shouldn't have a > > > return > > > path, otherwise they themselves may be rejected and > > soon > > > you'll have a > > > bounce loop. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards, > > > Stephen > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Stephen > -- Best Regards, Stephen Sent from Sydney, Nsw, Australia