On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 10:03:35AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:08 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Use .init_load_uA part of the bulk regulator API instead of calling
> > register_set_load() manually.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36672a.c | 11 +++--------
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36672a.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36672a.c
> > index 33fb3d715e54..3886372415c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36672a.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36672a.c
> > @@ -605,21 +605,16 @@ static int nt36672a_panel_add(struct nt36672a_panel 
> > *pinfo)
> >         struct device *dev = &pinfo->link->dev;
> >         int i, ret;
> >
> > -       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pinfo->supplies); i++)
> > +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pinfo->supplies); i++) {
> >                 pinfo->supplies[i].supply = nt36672a_regulator_names[i];
> > +               pinfo->supplies[i].init_load_uA = 
> > nt36672a_regulator_enable_loads[i];
> > +       }
> >
> >         ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(pinfo->supplies),
> >                                       pinfo->supplies);
> >         if (ret < 0)
> >                 return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get 
> > regulators\n");
> >
> > -       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pinfo->supplies); i++) {
> > -               ret = regulator_set_load(pinfo->supplies[i].consumer,
> > -                                        
> > nt36672a_regulator_enable_loads[i]);
> > -               if (ret)
> > -                       return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to set 
> > regulator enable loads\n");
> > -       }
> 
> Thanks for the cleanup! I happened to notice this commit and I'm
> curious why you didn't take the next step and move to
> devm_regulator_bulk_get_const(). That would have allowed you to avoid
> the "for" loop above that copies the data ;-)

I haven't noticed this function beforehand. Thanks for the pointer!

> 
> -Doug

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Reply via email to