On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian K?nig<deathsimple at vodafone.de> > wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA >> code, >> so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit. >> >> Most of the stuff still works fine without those offending changes, so to >> avoid >> mailing around unrelated and already reviewed patches, I request the include >> the following 17 patches into drm-next. >> >> If you prefer to merge they are also available from >> git://people.freedesktop.org/~deathsimple/linux branch reset-rework. >> >> Cheers, >> Christian. >> > I am ok with this 17 patchset, i just sent 3 patch on top of those 17 that > bring back some other of the previous cleanup. At least for now those three are NAK, cause I just realized we need to put those on top of a more sophisticated fence implementation.
Your idea of not using a list, but 64 bit sequences instead actually sounds quite nifty to me. Going to hack something together in the next couple of hours. Christian.