On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:28:49PM +0900, Seung-Woo Kim wrote:
> Hello Chris,
> 
> Thank you for reviewing.
> 
> On 2013? 07? 01? 19:23, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:06:31PM +0900, Seung-Woo Kim wrote:
> >> seq of a trace point is unsigned int but print format was %d. So
> >> it fixes the format as %u even the format can be not used.
> > 
> > I don't understand what you mean here. The patch itself looks fine.
> 
> I can not find where the format is used or not, so I think the format is
> not really used anywhere. If you want to fix the commit-msg, I'll update
> and re-send this patch.

One of the tricks performed by the TRACE() macro is that it prepends
"trace_" to the name of the tracepoint for use in the code.

git grep trace_drm_vblank_event:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:      trace_drm_vblank_event_delivered(e->base.pid, 
e->pipe,
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:      trace_drm_vblank_event_queued(current->pid, 
pipe,
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:      trace_drm_vblank_event(crtc, seq);
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Reply via email to