Eric Anholt wrote:
> Well, I've got most of the FreeBSD troubles straightened out I think.  I
> went ahead and did some glxgears benchmarks, waiting for the numbers to
> stabilize, of gentoo vs freebsd-current.
> 
> System is a 128MB 2xCeleron517 (BP6, OCed), diskless, booting gentoo or
> -current off of a -current system.  Video at 1280x1024x60hz, 16 bit.
> 
> gentoo 1.1, kernel 2.4.19-gentoo-r5 (custom, p2 opts but nothing special
> think)
> bsd-3-0-0-branch as of a few days ago
> kernel modules from bsd-3-0-0-branch from today
> twm
> 
> FreeBSD-current as of a few days ago.
> WITNESS and INVARIANTS disabled.
> bsd-3-0-0-branch as of a few days ago
> kernel modules from bsd-3-0-0-branch from today.
> No wm (sshing in).
> 
> Radeon 64MB VIVO, no pageflip:
> linux: 1325 fps
> bsd:   1324
> 
> Rage 128 Pro:
> linux: 581
> bsd:   582
> 
> Matrox G400
> linux: 923
> bsd:   755
> 
> Only the Matrox had problems, don't know what that was.    Still, I'm
> very excited about the Radeon numbers.

Nice.

I'm just looking a little at the code, wonder if there can be some name 
changes to simplify the macros a little.

We're using DRM_ prefixes for os-abstractions already, like DRM_DEBUG, so I 
don't think it's necessary to further specialize the namespace to DRM_OS_







-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to