On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Leif Delgass wrote: > > > Also, should I go ahead and commit my revised texmem patch? > > > > Yes. > > OK, will do. Do you want to commit your patch for combine3 to texmem? I > don't have an R200, so I can't test that, but it looks like it should be > easy to add there too. If SUBTRACT is the only problem, I don't think > that should prevent you committing it, as that's apparently a problem even > without the extension.
I went ahead and committed my texmem changes as well as combine3 for radeon and r200 (including the change to the zero/one table). I can't test the r200 version, but it looks almost identical to R100. I noticed that in the check for the scale factor in the Radeon driver, it uses RADEON_SCALE_4X for dot3. Should that be RADEON_SCALE_1X? That's what the r200 driver uses for the EXT version (R200_TX[C,A]_SCALE_1X). -- Leif Delgass http://www.retinalburn.net ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
