Ian Romanick wrote:

That aside, I think we should be able to remove xf86drmCompat.c now. Unless I'm mistaken, libdrm.a is statically linked into the *_dri.so. If that's the case, and all of the client-side drivers have been updated to not use the functions in xf86drmCompat.c, why do we need it? I looked at the mga driver with nm, and it doesn't reference any of the drmMGA* symbols.

If you have access to an XF4.2 system are older, you should check for drmMGA*, drmR128*, drmRadeon*, drmI810* and drmI830* in the 2D drivers...it's these 2D routines we're providing compatability for with the XFree86 server side libdrm.a module that's distributed with our binary packages.


--
                               /\
         Jens Owen            /  \/\ _
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /    \ \ \   Steamboat Springs, Colorado



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community?  Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to