On Sul, 2004-08-22 at 13:11, Dave Airlie wrote: > there should be no regression between them, I'd expect the currrnt CVS > ones might in theory be slower than 2.6.7 but I haven't seen any > regressions on the radeon modules while I've been doing the function table > work, 2.6.7 is pretty close to CVS about 5 mths ago... > > I don't think we have fixed any lockups or anything of that great interest > in this time ..
At least on the fedora-test list the new Xorg CVS seems to be showing up some i815/830 "works with 2.6.8.1 but not 2.6.old" kernels. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
