On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 10:12 -0500, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > >>>> With which part ? ;) > >>> > >>> On having a small stub module that does just IRQs ... I think the base > >>> module should be the fbdev (mode setting etc...) > >> > >> Oh, but I was not suggesting that. I just meant that interrupt handling > >> code is self-contained and can easily serve several consumers. > > > > I'm with you here. And the same should IMHO hold for DMA handling. And for > > memory management of course. > > With one refinement - the DMA code would need to be a customer of IRQ > code..
No, again, DMA is what DRM is for, or you want to re-invent the whole architecture ? Ben. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
