On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev writes:
We should probably have analogous code for r300.
Do you mean we should have swtcl code for r300, or something else?
There are two issues:
1. As was explained to me we need to have swtcl code in case we need
to do software fallback for some unsupported feature
2. Right *now* we are doing only swtcl, as no acceleration for
transform and lightning is being done.
So either way there is some code to port/write.
best
Vladimir Dergachev
Paul.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
