On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Dave Airlie<airl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Ben Hutchings<b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
>> Based on a patch by Jaswinder Singh Rajput . For Radeon 100- to 500-series,
>> firmware blobs look like:
>> struct { __be32 datah; __be32 datal; } cp_ucode[256];
>>For Radeon 600-series, firmware blobs look like:
>>__be32 pm4_ucode[PM4_UCODE_SIZE * 3];
>> __be32 pfp_ucode[PFP_UCODE_SIZE];
>>For Radeon 700-series, firmware blobs look like:
>>__be32 pm4_ucode[R700_PM4_UCODE_SIZE];
>> __be32 pfp_ucode[R700_PFP_UCODE_SIZE];
>>Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- This has been tested in Debian as a patch to
>>2.6.30. Ben.
>
> Something annoyed my reply formatting, but anyhoo, the mga and r128
> patches are fine.
>
> This patch has a few issues before I can put it into drm-next.
>
> 1. r600/r700 firmware probably should be split into two files, we have
> more firmware
> releases coming for another part of the chip, and I'm not sure how we can
> handle
> merging or versioning if we put all 3 into one blob. Maybe Alex can comment on
> AMDs preferred format.
I'll be easier to keep the various firmwares separate for r6xx/r7xx.
So that means separate files for the CP and the PFP microcode. If you
can split it up that way it would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Alex
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
