W dniu 26 lutego 2010 20:01 użytkownik Ville Syrjälä <syrj...@sci.fi> napisał: > Disabling the condition check doesn't make sense. > > You could use a completion. > > init_completion(vbl_irq); > enable_vbl_irq(); > wait_for_completion(vbl_irq); > disable_vbl_irq(); > and call complete(vbl_irq) in the interrupt handler. > > The same would of course work with just some flag or counter > and a wait queue.
Ouch, I can see it gone bad already. Firstly I simply just wanted to avoid condition in wait_event_*. It looked unnecessary as I got interrupts (signals). So I started playing with other solutions (like my wait_interruptible_timeout where I had not full understanding of waking up) and finally started analyzing over-complex things like completions. I'll just use some one more variable and some more basic solution. Thanks for help and sorry for taking your time. I hope to provide at least some of you dynamic radeon PM in return :) -- Rafał ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
