On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:14:14AM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > > If you write it like this: > > > > > > return !ret ? ret : -ETIMEDOUT; > > > > > > checkpatch shouldn't complain. > > > > No, but I will. > > > > That's horrid code, please be specific and readable, no one should ever > > use ?: syntax except within function parameters. > > why then don't we define it in the coding style, otherwise it's > just a matter of taste.
Because defining _everything_ in coding style is a loosing battle, sorry. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
