On 28 Jan 2010, at 14:04, Simon Brown wrote: > Having dug through the code a little more in the meantime, it seems > that the effect of pruneIndexes() is to remove from the browse indexes > information about items which are expunged and/or withdrawn; in that > light it might not be necessary to call it when items are added or > changed at all, thus reducing the patch to a single-line change. If > that's the case I'll happily withdraw mine in favour of the new one. :)
Simon, Can you provide me with a dump of your bi_* tables? I would like to look into the performance of those queries. Regards, G ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Dspace-devel mailing list Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel
