Hi all, I wanted to restart a thread about DSpace + Git development, as I'm imagining there are several of us who may be thinking "Yeah! DSpace is on GitHub. Now what?"
In particular, I'd like us to think about how we plan to develop DSpace releases in Git. There are several models I've stumbled across (all with pros/cons) and some are more structured than others. Therefore, I wanted to make others aware of these various models, and perhaps start some discussion on them. There's also surely other Git development models out there that I've missed (hence, this a public message on dspace-devel, to let anyone take part in this discussion and make suggestions). The Git development models I've been reading about so far include: * The (seemingly) most popular "git-flow" model (highly structured, with specific 'types' of branches): http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ (It even has its own 'git-flow' command line tools at: https://github.com/nvie/gitflow ) * The Fedora development model (less structured, but still some "rules" about using local branches heavily and avoiding development directly in "master"): https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FCREPO/Git+Guidelines+and+Best+Practices * Chris Wilper's well written guidelines: "How I use Git" (obviously very parallel to Fedora development model & almost a response to the "git-flow" model above): https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/~cwilper/How+I+Use+Git (I've also listed these on the new "Development with Git" page: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Development+with+Git#DevelopmentwithGit-SomeusefulGitDevelopmentGuidelines ) Admittedly, I'm still very much a novice on Git/GitHub development in larger teams. So, I'm not sold on any one model, and also feel there's great opportunity for us to create our own development model. But, I do feel it is good for us to take a closer look at what others are doing and determine what we like and don't like. Otherwise, I worry each DSpace committer/developer may take a slightly different approach to DSpace development in GitHub. That has the potential to cause merge complexities or just general "messiness" in our Git repository's commit history (which also may become annoying to the developers forking our repositories). Thoughts? Anyone else come across other Git development models that may be of interest to us all? - Tim -- Tim Donohue Technical Lead for DSpace Project DuraSpace.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Dspace-devel mailing list Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel