On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 11:51 +0200, Christian Voelker wrote: > So in case Sequoia and Terracotta turn out not to > be the way to go, then Slony deserves a second look. > But I agree that all this doesnt sound to be a job > for an afternoon.
NB: Terracotta is not part of a solution for replicating the database. It would / could be used for replicating session data between multiple web servers. In that case it is complimentary to either Sequoia or Slony, not an alternative. G -- Graham Triggs Technical Architect Open Repository BioMed Central Ltd Middlesex House 34-42 Cleveland Street London, W1T 4LB This e-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. BioMed Central Limited does not accept liability for any statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not expressly made on behalf of BioMed Central Limited. No contracts may be concluded on behalf of BioMed Central Limited by means of e-mail communication. BioMed Central Limited Registered in England and Wales with registered number 3680030 Registered Office Middlesex House, 34-42 Cleveland Street, London W1T 4LB ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
