On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Michael Reynolds <reyno...@uw.edu> wrote: > João, I don't see where the "very bad performance" would happen if we > were to use a separate solr server. Is your concern the delay > incurred while spinning up the redundant solr server? Or am I missing > something?
I believe the performance penalty João mentions stems from the fact that while DSpace communicates with the embedded Solr using direct Java calls, to talk to Solr on another machine it would have to use a network protocol, incurring overhead. I can't quantify that overhead. There's no information at all about embedded vs. remote on pages about performance. But here's a brief summary discussing them: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/EmbeddedSolr Regards, ~~helix84 Compulsory reading: DSpace Mailing List Etiquette https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
