9.1.2014 13:47, Radivoj Kar, F6GNZ kirjoitti:
Cesare,
I think it won't be good to automatically remove dupes from the log! Better
have them marked by a red colour and let user decide afterwards..
73, Radi F6GNZ
Le Jeudi 9 janvier 2014 10h58, PY2YP<py...@py2yp.com> a écrit :
A tool for removing dupes QSO should be great, say, the dupes QSO should
be saved in a temporary file allowing the user to examine the removed
QSOs before deleting the temp file.
--
73 DX de PY2YP - Cesar
A definition of a dupe would be good.
Does it mean a dupe like in a contest i.e. a separate contact that has
been made on the same band but at a different time?
I think that in this case it is a bad idea to remove the dupes from the
log. The dupe contact might be the only one that is both in your log and
the other stations log. The first occurence might not be in the other
stations log at all for some reason (he/she worked somebody else, had a
computer glitch etc).
On the other hand I have noticed that my log contains some QSOs that are
separated only by seconds. They have resulted by importing the same log
twice into another logging sw that I used before DX4Win. This kind of
contacts I have removed manually which was time consuming.
73 de Teijo OH6NIO
______________________________________________________________
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
