> >What really surprises me is that you think the GoldMoney site is good >though, considering you are a developer yourself! The GoldMoney site >is crap. It doesn't work with either Netscape or webtv... as far as I >am concerned, that is ridiculous. What about the other browsers, do >they work? > --------------------------- I've interacted with the GoldMoney site using IE, Netscape, and Opera with no problems whatsoever. As far as Web TV goes, it's crap and unless the implementation changes will remain insignificant. Also, from what I understand (based on some of my own development experience) is not compatable with certain types of basic security features a developer may choose to implement in a CGI script. PECB --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! SnowDog
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! Elwyn Jenkins
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! gary
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! GoldDirectory.com
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! Viking Coder
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! Khurram Khan
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! Jeff Fitzmyers
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! Sidd
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! SnowDog
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! Khurram Khan
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! Parker E.C. Bradley
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! jpm
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! ..k.b.ananda..
- [e-gold-list] Re: and wouldn't TWC be to die for! e-gold-list