Nguyen, Khanh D (IS) wrote:
> Emil,
>
> Please see the attachments for your requested info. The interface
> name for Intel 82574L is eth1. FYI, we tested the same computer with
> the same BIOS on 2.6.9-78 and confirmed the chipset worked with e1000e
> driver.
2.6 kernels have better chipset support, so that's not surprising. At least it
shows that the NIC is working.
>
> Thanks,
> Khanh
CPU0 CPU1
0: 21535 1001 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge keyboard
2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade
8: 1 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
14: 3934 425 IO-APIC-edge libata
15: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge libata
16: 38134 36652256 IO-APIC-level eth2
17: 563772 0 IO-APIC-level eth0
19: 0 0 IO-APIC-level eth1
21: 26967 1443 IO-APIC-level usb-uhci, usb-uhci, usb-uhci,
usb-uhci
23: 0 0 IO-APIC-level ehci-hcd
NMI: 0 0
LOC: 22441 45777
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
Interface is obviously not getting interrupts. Notice that counters are 0 for
eth1.
ethtool also fails the interrupt test:
The test result is PASS
The test extra info:
Register test (offline) 0
Eeprom test (offline) 0
Interrupt test (offline) 4
Loopback test (offline) 0
Link test (on/offline) 0
Interesting that ethtool reports the test as PASS even though it failed ...
You can try loading the kernel with noapic see if that helps, although this is
suboptimal. Maybe switching slots would help, not sure.
Thanks,
Emil
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, &
iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
