I go to a women's college for these exact reasons.  And yes, it does 
prepare women to live with and interact better with men in the "real 
world".  It's a common misconception that women's colleges and 
single-sex learning don't prepare women for the "real world"--actually, 
the opposite is true.  Consider this:  Only 1.5% of college women attend 
women's colleges, yet 25% of women members of Congress are women's 
college graduates, women's college graduates make up 1/3 of women board 
members of Fortune 1000 companies, women's college graduates are twice 
as likely to earn PhDs, of BusinessWeek's 50 highest ranking women in 
corporate America, 30% were women's college graduates, etc, etc, etc.  
Clearly, single-sex education makes women "better able to deal with men 
later in their lives".

Hayley

>       I find this to be an interesting debate- a lot of people have made
>good arguments that women can become more assertive and comfortable by
>having intelligent discussions without men around- men often do make a
>mess of things.  However, would it help make these women better able to
>deal with men later in their lives?  One thing I find interesting is 
that
>if you are in a setting where men and women are giving equal attention 
by
>a teacher, the men think that they are being snubbed and that the women
>are being favored.  Maybe a solution would be to have the women get
>together for awhile, and the men get together separately, and then put
>them all together later, and see what happens.  I really don't know- I
>just find that this topic is pretty intriguing.  It is hard for me to 
be
>in favor of something that excludes based on gender or ethnicity, but I
>can see good reasons for doing so when the excluded group tends to be
>beliggerent and domineering.
>       -Miguel
>
>______________________
>Miguel Ordorica
>Washington State Univ.
>Dept. of Sociology
>Wilson 206
>(509) 335-4595 (msg.)
>(509) 332-4442 (hme)
>______________________
>
>On Sat, 27 Feb 1999, Bertina Miller wrote:
>
>> The real world includes men, until there are no men in existence, 
then you
>> can say its ok not to include them in something. As for challenging 
the
>> status quo I am all for that. Doesnt mean that a person should be
>> exclusionary. Everyone learns from diversity not from exclusion.
>> 
>> Bertina
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Reply via email to