FYI.

Stefanie Rixecker
ECOFEM Coordinator

------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent:              Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:15:37 +0100
From:                   Kornelis Oosthoek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                Book Review: Women, Spirituality and the Environment
To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send reply to:          H-NET List for Environmental History 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

H-NETBOOK REVIEW

Published by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (October 2002)



Alaine Lowe and Soraya Tremayne, eds. _Women as Sacred Custodians of the

Earth?: Women, Spirituality and the Environment_. New York: Berghahn
Books.
260 pp. Preface and contributors. $49.95 (cloth), ISBN 1-57181-467-1
$19.95
(paper), ISBN 1-57181-316-0.



Reviewed for H-Women by Kelli Ann Costa

[EMAIL PROTECTED], Department of

Anthropology, Franklin Pierce College



The Natural Woman



This volume is an interesting collection of essays directed toward the popular
notion that women are inherently closer to nature, and therefore more
sympathetic to the natural world than men.  The editors have divided
the text into four parts: "The Current Debate", "The Sacred "  essays), "The
Great Religions", and "New Trends". This provocative and compelling work is
the result of a two-day workshop at the University of Oxford in 1996 that was
organized by the editors Alaine Low and Soraya Tremayne. Not quite a critique
of eco-feminist theory or the feminist environmental movement, the book is
more a "thinking document" regarding recent trends in linking women,
spirituality, the sacred, and the environment.



Pressing beyond simple New Age soft theory, the contributors offer many
stimulating intellectual arguments regarding women in cross-cultural
environments and their roles in a variety of guises and belief systems. Major
modern religions are explored as well as lesser known traditions.
In this review I will discuss the four parts of the text, the overall quality
of the text as a whole, and conclude with a discussion of the text's
possible value to feminist classrooms, women's studies and cultural
anthropology.



Part 1, the "Current Debate" contributes a dense and thoughtful essay by
Cecile Jackson which challenges the tenets of "Deep Ecology" and its tendency
toward "anti-dualism" (p. 25). Jackson points out that the notion of humanity
as part of nature (and therefore inseparable from it)  neglects
the gray areas that clearly exist between and among "polarized concepts" such
as male and female or nature and culture.  Equally problematic is the
humanizing of nature and the anthropomorphic relationships and gendered
identities that are projected onto the natural world (e.g., Mother Earth).
Jackson suggests that eco-feminists often misinterpret the presence of
goddesses in traditional belief systems as indicating "harmony and nurturance"
(p. 33), while ignoring the human sacrifice, violence and dehumanization that
often exists in goddess worshipping cultures.  She concludes by pointing to
many other assumptions that "ecological interpretations" of non-Western
religions make, cautioning that an ideology
of peace and a "reverence for life" does not always translate into basic
rights for women or protection for the environment (p. 37).



Part 2, "The Sacred" is a review of both ancient beliefs (Elena Kingdon) and
modern, traditional non-Western practices (Veronica Strang, Piers  Vitebsky
and Sally Wolfe, Sandra Bell, Terrance Ranger, and Monica Janowski). This
wide-ranging collection of essays presses the question of women as
natural, sacred custodians of the earth through five distinct examples.
Kingdon suggests that in Classical Greece there was an essential feminine
power that needed to be invoked for agriculture to be successful.  In this
case the
connection between women and the natural world is obvious, though, as Jackson
suggested earlier, women's status in the social world was not necessarily the
better for it. Strang's example of Aboriginal women and "sacred landscapes"
challenges Western notions of traditional cultures by questioning the
essentially feminine categorization of non-Western pre-industrial groups.


Vitebsky and Wolfe move further in their essay on Siberian reindeer herders
where men are closest to the earth, a realm usually preserved for women.  As
the political and economic climate is changing throughout the region the
herders find themselves relegated to the "lowest status," that often is
occupied by women (pp. 81-94). While an interesting and provocative article,
the difficulty lies in the authors' contention that the falling status of
male herders is more profound and degrading then the long-term,
historically low status of women in Siberian culture where they survive and
maintain their lives as invisible and unimportant.



Ranger's contribution "Preistesses and Environment in Zimbabwe"
contextualizes the historical status of women in the patriarchal structure of
the Shona and Ndebele groups.  Unlike witches, who embodied danger and evil,
women who participated in traditional earth-centered practices in
Zimbabwe, in other words those who conducted "positive" rites, were able to
exist above the rules of patriarchy.  Woman as priestess or "chieftainess"
helped balance power, establishing complementary (though essentially
patriarchal) roles in narrow slices of society. The final essay by Monica
Janowski examines the Kelabit of Sarawak and their conscious process of
maintaining balance by using rice as the symbolic scales between humanity and
the wild forces beyond.  Rice also symbolizes the social adulthood of women.
They plant it, nurture it, weed it and this care of the rice contributes to
their status as both specialists and caretakers.
Cultivation is done by adult couples and "has the capacity to join the genders
productively" (p. 113).  Janowski interprets this as allowing both men and
women of the Kelabit to retain responsibility as Part 3, "The Great Religions"
offers five essays on Christian (Anne Primavesi), Muslim (Tahera Aftab), Hindu
Tamil (Vijya Rettakudi Nagaragan),
Buddhist (Bell), and Chinese (Stewart McFarlane) cosmologies.  Primavesi
presents an essentially "Deep Ecology" critique of Christianity.  The binary
arguments have been made before.  First, Christianity separates humanity from
the natural world and places it as superior to and different from
it.
Secondly, within the discussion of women and nature, nature is female,  and
therefore contributes to the sexualized imagery of men's relationships to the
earth, and so on. The various definitions of nature and earth simply reinforce
the "Deep Ecology" assumptions critiqued so thoroughly by Jackson
in Part 1.



Aftab's discussion of women and Islam links the ethical framework of the Quran
and the misinterpretation of that framework by males in positions of
authority.  Though, as Aftab makes clear, the Quran is clear in setting out an
ethic of equity and justice for all, sadly it has been perverted,
especially by Muslim fundamentalists, into an ideology of hatred, oppression
and violence against women.  As with Christianity, "[w]omen and land have
become items of possession within Muslim societies.... [to be] controlled,
disputed, exchanged, and gifted" (p. 152).  Aftab suggests Muslim women must
regain access to the land and to nature in order to enjoy and attain true
freedom. In some areas women are taking active roles in reestablishing this
link through the Quran and Islam and through a variety of women's
organizations.  Nagarajan's essay on Hindu Tamil women's rituals and the idea
of "embedded ecologies" is a stellar contribution to this volume.
In a highly intellectual discussion of the sacred, the women's ritual of
_kolam_, and the shifting regard for sacralized, ecological space, Nagrarajan
provokes thoughtful response to the claim that Western epistemologies of
"ecology" are at odds with Hindu traditions of the sacred, natural world (pp.
159-174).  The ritual of _kolam_ exists at the boundary or
threshold of
women's social space; it is exclusive to women and connected to the goddesses
of the earth.  That this sacred space would also be a place  where trash is
thrown and where Western ecologists would see it as defiled, the
author reminds us that among Tamil, sacred space is invoked only as long
as
it is necessary.  Women may be custodians of pieces of the earth, but the
custodianship is fleeting and requires repetition when the space reverts
back to "common ground".



Bell's example of Theravada Buddhism in Thailand and Sri Lanka suggests
that
women are excluded from religious orders (male space) because of their
inherent polluting qualities.  Women are not perceived as "closer to
nature"
than men and in fact are not identified with "nature" at all. Modern
women
in Thailand and Sri Lanka who adhere to Theravada Buddhism may be in a
historically precipitous position due to the amount of work and labor
involved in caring for home and children, and the popular opinion of the
Sangha monks who see women as stupid and dangerous and impure. Women have
fewer opportunities to become involved in monastic life in any meaningful
way, custodianship of the earth is out of the question. To act in such a
way
would endanger male space which in turn endangers the world.  The final
essay in part 3 examines the historical influence of Taoist and
Confucianist
doctrine in China.  Though intriguing and highly informative, McFarlane
never quite addresses the idea of women as sacred custodians of the
earth.
The essay is more a critique of Confucianism and Western influence of
Chinese thought than a discussion of gender and women's understanding or
relationship to the environment.  Much like Bell's discussion above,
McFarlane describes the exclusive nature of modern Chinese cosmologies in
general without discussing the specific question of women's circumstances
because of it.



Part 4, "New Trends" is a single contribution discussing neo-Paganism and
what may have brought about a renewed interest in earth-centered
"wholeness".  While Amy Simes describes at length the tenets of
neo-Paganism
and its relationship to the feminine (and masculine) and its quest for
balance (wholeness), the essay does not get much beyond simple
description.
With the opportunity to "get at" the idea of the sacred (so effectively
done, for example, by Nagarajan) the author skims the surface of the
relevant beliefs.  In this section called "New Trends," the question is:
what is new here?  More a resurrection of the obscure when used in the
context of the mytho-historical, the highly organized and competing
factions
of the neo-Pagan movement (and the varying status of women and men among
them) are mentioned only briefly.  The contribution is an opportunity
missed
rather than an opportunity taken.



Overall, the text is engaging and highly informative.  While lacking some
intellectual balance (neo-Paganism may not be the only "new trend";
informing readers of theoretical critiques beyond those of "Deep Ecology"
and humanism) the volume is highly relevant to the current state of
affairs
of women in many different cosmological and environmental situations.
While
appearing to be a challenge to eco-feminism, the volume stands as a
critique
of Western hegemonic epistemologies of "the other" and the overwhelming
(and
often unrecognized) influence of Judeo-Christianity upon interpretations
of
non-Western belief.  In this current period of reflection and fear in the
West, books such as this are welcome as thoughtful and a challenge to
readers in the West to look beyond cultural boundaries that seem to be
more
clearly circumscribed in this time of globalization and one world
rhetoric.



While there are some areas of the text that I feel could have better
discussed such as the idea of women as sacred custodians of the earth,
the
text could be an interesting addition to an upper-level undergraduate or
lower-level graduate course on religion, feminist theory or human
ecology.
The text could have been "pulled together" more effectively with an
epilogue
that would serve as a concluding statement, returning to the binary
argument
of women=nature, men=culture as first discussed in the introduction.  As
the
essays progress, there is a tendency to stray from the question of women
as
inherently closer to nature than men, the essays become descriptive and
in
many cases don't offer critical analyses of the subject of gendered
lives.
Because of this, some classroom examination of these issues would be
necessary in order to bring the offerings full circle and return to the
initial critique and intention of the book.



Copyright 2002 by H-Net, all rights reserved. H-Net permits the
redistribution and reprinting of this work for nonprofit, educational
purposes, with full and accurate attribution to the author, web location,
date of publication, originating list, and

H-Net: Humanities & Social Sciences Online. For other uses contact the
Reviews editorial staff: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------- End of forwarded message -------
************************************
Dr. Stefanie S. Rixecker, Director
Environment, Society and Design Division
Lincoln University, Canterbury
PO Box 84
Aotearoa New Zealand
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: 03-325-2811, x8643
************************************


Reply via email to