Please do not reply to this email, use the link below. http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001897
--- Comment #14 from Sergei Gavrikov <sergei.gavri...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #12) > FYI I obtained documents from NXP stating that the LPC1765 CAN cell is > exactly the same one than on the LPC2xxx, that conformance tests have > been done by NXP on the LPC2XXX ... Bernard, thank you for persistence. Q: But the same with which parts (LPC2XXX, LPC2XXX/00, LPC2XXX/01)? https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=lpc2294+errata I see 3 errata sheets for LPC2294 (LPC2XXX and LPC2XXX/00 parts have 7 CAN.1-CAN.7 erratums; LPC2XXX/01 parts have only one - CAN.1). Perhaps, CAN cells on LPC17XX are more modern. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.