On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 03:31:53PM +0200, Benedikt Driessen wrote: > Starting ecryptfsd (the one from the git-repository) with both > patches applied to 2.6.24 results in a kernel-oops (which is an > improvement, at least not the whole system crashes..).
In that case, I would bet that you still get an oops even without the NFS patch applied. These two patches do not touch the same regions of code, and there is no reason for the NFS patch to affect the procfs patch. Please post the contents of the oops from your system log (along with any other interesting error messages). Thanks, Mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________ eCryptfs-devel mailing list eCryptfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecryptfs-devel
