OK guys and gals, this is getting very close to the neverending
discussion of which way the toilet paper should roll. The PS030805 post
is ingenious and creative, except it didn't format well for me, as you
can see below, which I've truncated for bandwidth (and sanity)
preservation. It may format even worse the second time around. Since
I'm sure it was tongue-in-cheek, I don't think Paul will mind.
ps030805 wrote:
<enough>
Perhaps we could compromise > A very good point!
Not only
and _side_ post, but only on > removing the
unneccessary parts
the _left_side_. It's actually > of a message you
reply to is
quite fun, and you can read the > important, it is
also very
original message with your right > important NOT to
reply _atop_
eye, while simultaneously reading > the original message
but _below_
</okenough>
Fred K6DGW
Auburn CA CM98lw
Thanks to all for the contacts in the CQP. I was at N6A in Alpine
County on CW. Almost got blown off the mountain, but we did manage
1,152 unaudited QSO's.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
