-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I spent a few years with just the stock K2 when it came to audio
filtering. Thought it was great just like it was. Last year I put the
DSP filter in. Now I am sold on it. I love the noise removal function
on the thing. I find that if the noise blanker can't get rid of it,
then the DSP usually can. Yes, it sometimes messes with your mind as
the audio can sound like it is underwater, but it does not do that
too often. I have found that if it sounds like that then I have
something set up wrong - the filter is too narrow or something like
that. A few seconds of button pressing usually solves that pretty quick.
If I had it to do again, I would still go the DSP route over the base
K2.
On Apr 6, 2006, at 1:15 PM, Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy wrote:
Keith KD1E wrote on Thursday, April 06, 2006 5:14 PM
Great reply Vic,
Let's widen the question to make it KAF2 or KDSP2 or NOTHING? Does
the
basic K2's crystal filtering work well enough that you (any of you)
would be happy with no AF filtering or does the AF/DSP filtering add
enough that you wouldn't want to be without it?
Randy Rathbun NV0U
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K2 #1981 KX1#1318
QRPARCI #10776, ARS #895, FPQRP #1292, KCQRP #1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFENWGE6zTmfegBFIERAkS2AJ9/vBfK/nBman6eEbWdB+eJOVkH5QCdG3jt
jypHZRB582GqJnUh/wpObVk=
=A/oT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
