Guys,

I've mentioned this caviet before:

http://n2.nabble.com/Ref-Osc-Cal-Method-4-td2595451.html#a2595451

The way the K3 implements the passband shift, the same signal, with the same 
VFO setting, will have a different audio beat note if the SHIFT control is 
changed. *

So your calibrations with your atomic standards are no better than the delta F 
that takes place when you vary the shift control.

If you want to measure frequency with the K3 BW and SHIFT *always* set to the 
same values then OK. However, calibrating at 50Hz BW and normalized SHIFT and 
then changing to SSB bandwidths and declaring that some stations are "on 
frequency" and others aren't is stretching it.

* I've discussed this with Wayne and it's considered IP.

Wes  N7WS

--- On Tue, 11/17/09, juergen piezo <plebia...@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: juergen piezo <plebia...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 frequency accuracy versus displayed precision
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Tuesday, November 17, 2009, 12:53 AM


Hi Paul

I find the same thing, I have checked the clubs K3's against a rubidium 
standard that was calibrated to a cesium standard. The K3  is spot on, the only 
limitation  being  its 1hz calibration step limit for the TCXO. I wonder what 
use the yet to be released external standard interface will be when we can 
only  adjust the TCXO  in 1 hz steps.

Its amazing  how far off frequency most stations are when you use a radio thats 
dead on, the typical average being 40 to 80hz off. The K3 sounds so good on RX 
these days, its easy  to pick stations that are off frequency by even a few HZ. 
The radios that I have found to be consistently on frequency are the IC7700 and 
IC7800.

 The SSB stations that impress me the most for being on frequency are the 
different Aeronautical control towers. These control towers have such excellent 
audio quality and they are always spot on frequency. Its a shame  that more ham 
stations cant sound so professional and clear like these aeronautical SSB 
stations. I have always wondered what brand of transmitter they use?  The 
excessive bass and ESSB audio  that we hear so often  just sounds so awful in 
comparison. Excessive bass and ESSB is just not good audio for SSB use. (I dont 
want to start a SSB debate!) but ESSB bassy audio sucks in comparison to these 
commercial SSB stations!

John


--- On Mon, 11/16/09, Paul Kirley <pkir...@fuse.net> wrote:

> From: Paul Kirley <pkir...@fuse.net>
> Subject: [Elecraft] K3 frequency accuracy versus displayed precision
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 6:28 PM
> The K3 is capable of displaying
> frequencies to 1 Hz.  It can 
> be calibrated to somewhat less than 1 Hz against WWV
> (method 2).
> 
> Because I wanted to see if my K3 serial 1322 was capable
> of
> measuring frequency to its displayed precision, I decided
> to 
> attempt the November 11/12 ARRL Frequency Measuring Test.
> 
> I warmed up my K3 for about two hours because--even with
> the
> optional TCXO--my K3 drifts almost 0.1 ppm per degree
> Centigrade
> from 25C to 30C, the latter part of its warmup range this
> time
> of year at my QTH.  (0.1 ppm is almost 1 Hz on 40
> meters.)
> 
> Then I carefully used method 2 to calibrate against 10 MHz
> WWV, 
> checking after exiting REF CAL by tuning across WWV on CW
> with
> SPOT activated to see that the beat notes were similar on
> each
> side of zero beat for 1 and 2 Hz off frequency.  (A
> lack of
> similarity indicates that a small tweak of REF CAL is
> needed.)
> Tuning past WWV's carrier on CW with SPOT enabled also
> provides
> practice for the real thing.
> 
> When W1AW (and each of the other FMT stations) began its
> call-up,
> I tuned its frequency to be centered in the passband with
> the DSP
> set at 50 Hz bandwidth.  When the long dashes began, I
> turned on
> SPOT and zero-beated against the sidetone with 1 Hz fine
> tuning.
> 
> After recording the result, I moved on to the other
> frequencies
> and stations that had been specified in the ARRL FMT 
> announcement.  I was able to copy and measure 4 of the
> 5 tests,
> with one station on one frequency being inaudible at my
> QTH.
> 
> Result:  my K3 was within 1 Hz on all 4 readings, that
> is, its 
> accuracy matched its displayed precision--after warmup and
> careful calibration.
> 
> 73, Paul W8TM
> 
>



      
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to