How are you measuring resistance?

Matt
W8ESE




On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Alan Bloom <a...@elecraft.com> wrote:
> It is important to use an anti-static mat to prevent damage to
> electronic devices when working on solid-state equipment.  Since
> Elecraft is heavily kit-oriented this is a topic of interest for
> Elecrafters.
>
> Quite some time ago I did some testing on the Radio Shack portable
> anti-static mat and found that its resistance was way too high to do a
> proper job of bleeding off static charges.  I then bought another
> low-cost mat from Jameco and it also measured way too high.  I began to
> doubt my testing methodology (described in a previous message, copied
> below).
>
> So now I have bought a third mat.  This one is more expensive, but
> unlike the cheaper mats it has an actual data sheet that specifies that
> it meets ANSI specs for anti-static performance.  I figured if it also
> measured bad then my testing must be in error.
>
> But it didn't.  Here are the results:
>
> Radio Shack P/N 276-2370 ($22.99) - 26 G ohms (26,000 M ohms)
> Jameco P/N 10584 ($16.45) - 44 G ohms (44,000 M ohms)
> Digi-Key P/N 16-1121-ND, (Desco 66164) ($38.18) - 41 M ohms
>
> The Desco mat's resistance is about 1000x lower than the cheaper ones!
>
> This mat is quite large, (2 x 3 feet, 61 x 91.4 cm) so if you buy one
> you may need to cut it down to fit on your workbench.  It comes with a
> "common point ground kit" (that you have to install on the mat yourself)
> that provides a long wire with solder lug to connect to ground and a
> two-socket connector for connecting one or two wrist straps.  The wrist
> strap and cord have to be purchased separately.  It looks like Digi-Key
> P/N SCP172-ND for $8.95 should work.
>
> So the total cost is about $47.  But the cheap mats are no bargain if
> they don't work.
>
> I tried cleaning the surface of the mats with some wipes that are
> especially intended for cleaning anti-static mats (Digi-Key MTT20-ND)
> and they did help.  The Radio Shack mat went from 26 to 6 Gohms and the
> Jameco went from 44 to about 12 Gohms.  But those numbers are still way
> too high.  The Desco mat's resistance also went down, from 41 to 20
> Mohms.
>
> The Desco mat came with a small spray bottle of "Rezstore", their own
> brand of mat cleaner.
>
> By the way, the back side of the Desco mat is some kind of
> highly-conductive black rubber, apparently to keep the entire mat
> surface at equal potential.  They warn that you should always use it
> blue side up because the resistance of the back side is too low.  Sure
> enough, it was low enough to measure with my digital multimeter - about
> 80 kohms.
>
> So my recommendation is to buy a mat such as the Desco model that has a
> data sheet that specifies that it meets ANSI/ESD S4.1 or ANSI/ESD
> S20.20.  If you already have the Radio Shack mat, then either replace it
> or at least clean it with a cleaner approved for ESD mats.  (You're not
> supposed to use soap or detergent because it might harm the anti-static
> properties.)  Gary KI4GGX recommends a product made by Techspray:
> http://www.all-spec.com/products/1733-QT.html
>
> Whatever you use, it is important to keep the mat clean.
>
> A word about my test procedure.  Accuracy is not very good because I am
> trying to read the peak amplitude of a brief needle flicker.  If I had
> an analog meter with a high-impedance input that would work better
> because the reading wouldn't change so fast.  Also my sauce pans no
> doubt do not give the same answer as the ANSI-specified test probes.  So
> overall, I doubt my measurement accuracy is better than +/- 50% or so.
> But for the purposes of this test that's good enough.
>
> In the test procedure below I had to substitute a 1.0 uF capacitor when
> measuring the Tesco mat in order to get a long-enough time constant to
> measure accurately.  (Also, it's actually a Triplett meter, not a
> Simpson.)
>
> Alan N1AL
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 09:51 -0800, Alan Bloom wrote:
>> Well, I've convinced myself that the Radio Shack portable ESD mat, P/N
>> 276-2370 doesn't work properly.
>>
>> The "ESD Association" http://www.esda.org has promulgated an
>> industry-standard test for ESD mats, ESD S4.1.  It is the standard
>> specified by most commercial mats.  I decided not to spring for the $70
>> to buy a copy of the standard, but other information I found on the web
>> describes the test in general terms.  It uses two circular electrodes,
>> each weighted with 5 pounds, spaced 10 inches apart on the mat.  The
>> "Point to Point Resistance" is specified to be:
>>
>> At 40-60% RH: 10^6 - 10^7 ohms
>> At 20-40% RH: 10^7 - 10^8 ohms
>> At 10-20% RH: 10^8 - 10^9 ohms
>>
>> I don't know what the RH here in Santa Rosa was yesterday when I did the
>> test, but I don't think it was very low since it has been raining
>> recently and the ground is still damp.  For sure the resistance
>> shouldn't be below 10^9 ohms (1 gigohm) and probably more like 10^8 or
>> 10^7 (100 or 10 megohms).
>>
>> I measured 2.5 x 10^10 ohms (25 gigohms), which puts the Radio Shack mat
>> way out of spec.
>>
>> Test procedure:
>>
>> I didn't find a specification on the electrode size, but in the photo of
>> a popular tester they look to be maybe 3 or 4 inches in diameter.  For
>> my test, the electrodes were two saucepans, each about 7 inches in
>> diameter and weighted with 5 pounds.  They were spaced 10 inches apart
>> on the mat (3 inches edge-to-edge).  I connected a 0.1 uF film capacitor
>> between the two pans and charged it to 15V with a power supply.
>>
>> I set my ancient Simpson analog volt-ohm meter to 60 uA full scale.  If
>> I touch the leads across the capacitor immediately after charging, the
>> needle momentarily jumps to about 6 uA (1/10 full scale) as the
>> capacitor discharges through the meter.  If I wait half an hour (1800
>> seconds) for the capacitor to partially discharge through the mat
>> resistance, the needle jumps to about 3 uA.
>>
>> An R-C network discharges to 3/6 of original voltage in about 0.7 time
>> constant.  So the time constant must be 1800/0.7 = 2571 seconds.  That
>> implies the mat resistance is 2571 sec / 0.1 uF ~= 2.5 x 10^10 ohms.
>>
>> Al N1AL
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to