Thanks for the tip! On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Markus Schulze wrote:
> Dear Forest, > > you wrote (27 Sep 2002): > > A "Condorcet Flavored PR Method" is an M-winner election method that > > (1) compares candidate subsets of cardinality M head-to-head, and > > (2) does the comparison in such a way that the winning combination > > of any head-to-head comparison provides better PR representation > > than the loser subset, and > > (3) gives the win to the "beats-all" combination if there is such > > a subset. > > Tideman has proposed such an election method: > > T. Nicolaus Tideman, Daniel Richardson, > "Better Voting Methods Through Technology: The > Refinement-Manageability Trade-Off in the Single > Transferable Vote," PUBLIC CHOICE, vol. 103, > p. 13-34, 2000 (http://www.econ.vt.edu/tideman/rmt.pdf) > > This paper by Tideman and Richardson is reprinted in this book: > > Shaun Bowler, Bernard Grofman, "Elections in Australia, Ireland, > and Malta under the single transferable vote," University of > Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2000. > > "Condorcet Flavored PR Methods" have also been discussed several times > in the journal "Voting Matters": > > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/single-transferable-vote/files/Voting_Matters_1-10_pdf.zip > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/single-transferable-vote/files/Voting_Matters_12_pdf.zip > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/single-transferable-vote/files/Voting_Matters_13_pdf.zip > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/single-transferable-vote/files/Voting_Matters_14_Dec-2001.zip > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/single-transferable-vote/files/Voting_Matters_15_Jun-2002.zip > > Markus Schulze > > ---- > For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc), > please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em > > ---- For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc), please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em