David Reitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Daniel Brockman <daniel <at> brockman.se> writes:
I just thought I'd point out that substituting `<at>' for `@' in the body of a message is counter-effective against harvesting, since this makes the address slip through [1,2] the filter for the archive web interface which ordinarily removes all addresses completely (replacing them with `<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' or somesuch). Of course, if someone has a copy of the actual message, they can just look in the CC header to find the address in plaintext. -- Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-04/msg00893.html [2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-04/msg00476.html _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
