Chong Yidong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch fixes the bug. However, it's pure hackery since I'm not
> familiar with the code at all. Can someone tell me if it makes sense
> to do this?
It seems like you got the test wrong -- this looks more correct
to me:
if (NILP (tip_frame) !! frame != XFRAME (tip_frame))
remember_mouse_glyph (frame, event->x, event->y, &last_mouse_glyph);
Does it still fix the bug with this change? If so, feel free to
install the change with a suitable comment explaining why it is
needed.
>
> *** emacs/src/xterm.c.~1.884.~ 2005-10-17 08:54:26.000000000 -0400
> --- emacs/src/xterm.c 2005-10-19 18:45:30.000000000 -0400
> ***************
> *** 3609,3615 ****
> last_mouse_scroll_bar = Qnil;
> note_mouse_highlight (frame, event->x, event->y);
> /* Remember which glyph we're now on. */
> ! remember_mouse_glyph (frame, event->x, event->y, &last_mouse_glyph);
> return 1;
> }
>
> --- 3609,3616 ----
> last_mouse_scroll_bar = Qnil;
> note_mouse_highlight (frame, event->x, event->y);
> /* Remember which glyph we're now on. */
> ! if (!NILP (tip_frame) && frame != XFRAME (tip_frame))
> ! remember_mouse_glyph (frame, event->x, event->y, &last_mouse_glyph);
> return 1;
> }
--
Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
